One advantage of a flexible constitution is that it

Step 1: Analyze the question The question asks for an advantage of a flexible constitution. So we need to pick the option that is a positive feature, not a weakness.

Step 2: Explain the concept A flexible constitution is one that can be amended easily, using the same procedure as an ordinary law (usually a simple majority in the legislature). Britain's unwritten constitution is the classic example. Its main strengths are:

• It adapts quickly to changing social, political and economic conditions.
• It avoids the long, costly amendment processes of rigid constitutions.
• It reduces the chance of political crises caused by outdated provisions.

A rigid constitution (like Nigeria's 1999 Constitution, which requires a two-thirds majority and state approval) is the opposite: it is hard to change.

Step 3: Evaluate each option

• A. Can lead to dictatorship: This is a disadvantage. If rulers can change the constitution easily, they may abuse power.
• B. Can easily be manipulated: Also a disadvantage, since those in power may alter it for selfish reasons.
• C. Is best suited for a federation: Incorrect. Federations usually need a rigid constitution to protect the powers shared between the central and state governments.
• D. Can be amended by a simple majority: This is the defining feature of flexibility, and it is the benefit that makes the constitution adaptable. It is the advantage.

Step 4: Answer

Tip: For "advantage of flexible constitution" questions, look for words like adaptable, easily amended, or simple majority. Options that suggest abuse (dictatorship, manipulation) are disadvantages. Remember: Flexible = Fast change; Rigid = Resistant to change.