NECO 2001 Physics · Question 11
Which statement is a correct consequence of the uncertainly principle?
Options
- A.A particle’s kinetic energy cannot be measured accurately at any time
- B.Both momemtum and energy of a particle can be known with absolute certainly
- C.It is possible to measure exactly both the position and momentum of a particle at the same time
- D.The complete knowledge of the position of a particle implies the complete ignorance of its energy
- E.The uncertainty in our knowledge of energy and the duration taken to measure it, are each less than Planck’s constant.
Answer: D. The complete knowledge of the position of a particle implies the complete ignorance of its energy
Explanation written with AI and checked against the answer key
Analyze the question: You are asked which statement follows from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
Concept: The principle says certain pairs of quantities cannot both be known precisely at the same time:
- Position and momentum: Δx · Δp ≥ h/4π
- Energy and time: ΔE · Δt ≥ h/4π
If one quantity in a pair is known very precisely, the uncertainty in the other becomes very large.
Step-by-step check of the options:
- A. Wrong. Kinetic energy can be measured accurately. The principle limits pairs of quantities, not a single measurement.
- B. Wrong. It says momentum and energy can both be known with absolute certainty, but the principle limits precision for conjugate pairs (such as position and momentum), and this statement overreaches.
- C. Wrong. This is exactly what the principle forbids. Position and momentum cannot both be measured exactly at the same time.
- D. Complete knowledge of position (Δx → 0) forces Δp → ∞. Since kinetic energy is p²/2m, the uncertainty in momentum means the particle's energy is hugely uncertain.
- E. Wrong. The principle says the product ΔE·Δt is at least of the order of Planck's constant (h/4π), not less than it.
Answer: Option D is the best choice. Precisely fixing position (Δx → 0) makes the momentum uncertainty enormous, and so the energy, which depends on momentum, becomes essentially unknown.
Exam tip: Remember "precise in one, fuzzy in the other." Any option claiming you can know both members of a conjugate pair exactly (C, B), or that the product of uncertainties is less than h (E), is wrong. Look for the option that says knowing one very well leaves the other very uncertain.
AI can make mistakes. Report anything that looks wrong.
Past questions © the examination body (JAMB/WAEC/NECO). DeeepSolve is not affiliated with them. Rights holders: see /copyright.
