JAMB 2020 Government · Question 20
The simple plurality electoral system is often criticized because _________
Options
- A.the ruling party may lose the election
- B.the winner may not poll an absolute majority
- C.it works against all opposition parties
- D.it is easy to rig
Answer: B. the winner may not poll an absolute majority
Explanation written with AI and checked against the answer key
Step 1: Analyze the question The question asks why the simple plurality electoral system is criticized.
Step 2: Explain the concept Simple plurality, also called "first-past-the-post," means the candidate with the most votes wins, even if that candidate does not get more than 50% of the votes. Plurality means "the largest number," while majority means "more than half."
Example: In a three-candidate race, the votes might be:
- Candidate X: 38%
- Candidate Y: 32%
- Candidate Z: 30%
X wins under simple plurality, yet 62% of voters voted for someone else. X won without an absolute majority.
Step 3: Evaluate the options
- A. The ruling party may lose the election. This is true of any fair electoral system and is not a criticism of plurality in particular.
- B. The winner may not poll an absolute majority. This is the classic criticism. The winner can be elected by a minority of voters, so many people feel the result does not reflect the will of the majority.
- C. It works against all opposition parties. Not true. It often favors large parties, but opposition parties can and do win under it.
- D. It is easy to rig. Rigging depends on how elections are administered, not on the counting formula.
Step 4: Answer The correct option is B.
Step 5: Exam tip Remember: Plurality = Most votes, Majority = More than half. Whenever you see "plurality" or "first-past-the-post" in a criticism question, think "winner without 50%+."
AI can make mistakes. Report anything that looks wrong.
Past questions © the examination body (JAMB/WAEC/NECO). DeeepSolve is not affiliated with them. Rights holders: see /copyright.
